DEEPAK KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR — CRM-M/54432/2025

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011502862025

Filing Number

CRM-M/78630/2025

Filing Date

15-Sep-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/54432/2025

Registration Date

23-Sep-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK KUMAR

    Adv. Raj Kumar Chauhaan

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

  3. 3.SUBHASH CHANDER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 442 (dated 23.09.2024) registered under IPC Sections 406, 420, 506 and Emigration Act Section 24 against petitioner Deepak Kumar, finding that parties had reached a genuine compromise without pressure or coercion. Exercising powers under Section 482 Cr.PC, the court determined a remote possibility of conviction existed and quashed all consequential proceedings to prevent unnecessary criminal trial vagaries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/54432/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 442 (dated 23.09.2024) registered under IPC Sections 406, 420, 506 and Emigration Act Section 24 against petitioner Deepak Kumar, finding that parties had reached a genuine compromise without pressure or coercion. Exercising powers under Section 482 Cr.PC, the court determined a remote possibility of conviction existed and quashed all consequential proceedings to prevent unnecessary criminal trial vagaries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case