RAJESH vs JAGDISH AND ANR — RSA/3658/2017

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Jul-2017

CNR: PHHC011289082017

Filing Number

RSA/3658/2017

Filing Date

13-Jul-2017

Registration No

RSA/3658/2017

Registration Date

14-Jul-2017

Judge

Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain

Coram

Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH

    Adv. SAMRAT MALIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAGDISH AND ANR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Pankaj JainView PDF

    Case Summary: RSA/3658/2017 The High Court for Punjab and Haryana disposed of the appeal by approving a settlement deed dated 26.8.2022 between appellant Rajesh and respondents Jagdish and Pawan Kumar. The dispute arose from conflicting claims over land originally owned by Pawan, who had executed two separate agreements to sell—one to Jagdish (resulting in a 2004 sale deed) and another to Rajesh. The court decreed the suit in terms of the settlement agreement and made it part of the final decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Aug-2018

    Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal

  4. 13-Aug-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh

  5. 05-Mar-2018

    Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal

  6. 05-Mar-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh

  7. 07-Nov-2017

    —

    Dr. Justice S. Muralidhar

  8. 17-Jul-2017

    Mr. Justice Rajbir Sehrawat

  9. 17-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 13-Jul-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/3658/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RSA/3658/2017 The High Court for Punjab and Haryana disposed of the appeal by approving a settlement deed dated 26.8.2022 between appellant Rajesh and respondents Jagdish and Pawan Kumar. The dispute arose from conflicting claims over land originally owned by Pawan, who had executed two separate agreements to sell—one to Jagdish (resulting in a 2004 sale deed) and another to Rajesh. The court decreed the suit in terms of the settlement agreement and made it part of the final decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case