DHARAMPAL AND OTHERS vs ST PATRICKS REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS — FAO-COM/26/2022

Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011142232022

Filing Number

FAO-COM/45773/2022

Filing Date

10-Oct-2022

Registration No

FAO-COM/26/2022

Registration Date

29-Oct-2022

Judge

Justice (To Be Nominated) , Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Coram

Justice (To Be Nominated) , Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Bench Type

Double

Category

78.2 - FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER (COMMERCIAL) ( 254 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHARAMPAL AND OTHERS

    Adv. GAGANDEEP SINGH

  2. 2.JAGAN SINGH

  3. 3.AJIT SINGH

  4. 4.ARUN

  5. 5.TARUN

  6. 6.SANTOSH DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ST PATRICKS REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS

  2. 2.TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING

  3. 3.DISTRICT TOWN PLANNER

  4. 4.SENIOR TOWN PLANNER

  5. 5.SUB REGISTER

  6. 6.DC

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Justice (To Be Nominated),mr. Justice Parmod GoyalView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed both appeals arising from an interim order in a suit between Dharampal and St Patricks Realty Private Limited as infructuous. The court held that since the underlying suit had been decided based on a compromise between the parties, the appeals challenging the interim order had lost their efficacy and could not proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO-COM/26/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed both appeals arising from an interim order in a suit between Dharampal and St Patricks Realty Private Limited as infructuous. The court held that since the underlying suit had been decided based on a compromise between the parties, the appeals challenging the interim order had lost their efficacy and could not proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case