TARANNUM KHATOON AND ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS — CRWP/7107/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011011822026

Filing Number

CRWP/47988/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRWP/7107/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TARANNUM KHATOON AND ANR

    Adv. Silvi Katoch

  2. 2.TARANNUM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

  2. 2.TARANNUM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRWP-7107-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the Superintendent of Police, Kurukshetra to decide the petitioners' representation and grant them police protection if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. The petitioners, who solemnized their marriage on 08.06.2026 (with one petitioner converting to Hinduism by free will before marriage), sought protection from apprehended danger from private respondents opposing the marriage. The court clarified that the protection order does not express any opinion on marriage validity nor grant immunity from legal action for any law violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/7107/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRWP-7107-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the Superintendent of Police, Kurukshetra to decide the petitioners' representation and grant them police protection if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. The petitioners, who solemnized their marriage on 08.06.2026 (with one petitioner converting to Hinduism by free will before marriage), sought protection from apprehended danger from private respondents opposing the marriage. The court clarified that the protection order does not express any opinion on marriage validity nor grant immunity from legal action for any law violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case