SATNARAYAN SHARMA vs RAMAN KUMAR AND ORS. — CR/1926/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010843962021

Filing Number

CR/31544/2021

Filing Date

13-Sep-2021

Registration No

CR/1926/2021

Registration Date

14-Sep-2021

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATNARAYAN SHARMA

    Adv. SARJU PURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMAN KUMAR AND ORS.

  2. 2.SHRISHTA RANI

  3. 3.REKHA RANI

  4. 4.NEELAM RANI

  5. 5.NISHA RANI

  6. 6.SAVITA RANI

  7. 7.PAWAN KUMAR

  8. 8.VIDYA RANI

  9. 9.USHA RANI

  10. 10.TRIPTA DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas BahlView PDF

    The High Court upheld the lower court's order allowing the respondents to amend their plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, rejecting the petitioner's challenge. However, the court imposed a significant restriction: respondents are barred from leading any further evidence in pursuance of the amendment, and the petitioner is granted the opportunity to file an amended written statement, ensuring procedural fairness at the rebuttal evidence stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/1926/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court upheld the lower court's order allowing the respondents to amend their plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, rejecting the petitioner's challenge. However, the court imposed a significant restriction: respondents are barred from leading any further evidence in pursuance of the amendment, and the petitioner is granted the opportunity to file an amended written statement, ensuring procedural fairness at the rebuttal evidence stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case