SUBHASH BANSAL vs STATE OF HARYANA — CWP/14938/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010811032026

e-Filing Number

11-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29432/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14938/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Category

97.5 - VIRES (GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS) ( 868 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226, 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHASH BANSAL

    Adv. MUNISH KAMBOJ

  2. 2.State of Haryana

  3. 3.Ram Lal

  4. 4.Mahinder Singh

  5. 5.Gurnam Singh

  6. 6.Sukhdev Singh

  7. 7.Ramesh Kumar

  8. 8.Hem Raj

  9. 9.Ram Swrup

  10. 10.Kuldeep Singh

  11. 11.Nathuni Thakur

  12. 12.Bohar Singh

  13. 13.Jaswant Singh

  14. 14.Kallu Ram

  15. 15.Ranjha Ram Bathla

  16. 16.Rajkumar Sahuwala

  17. 17.Chander Prakash

  18. 18.Purshotam Dass

  19. 19.Krishan Kumar

  20. 20.Dharampal

  21. 21.Dalip Singh

  22. 22.Gugan Ram

  23. 23.Ramsarup

  24. 24.Meghraj

  25. 25.Kashmir

  26. 26.Durga Parsad

  27. 27.Pyare Lal

  28. 28.Anil Kumar

  29. 29.Murlidhar

  30. 30.Mohan Lal

  31. 31.Ram Niwas

  32. 32.Kashi Ram

  33. 33.Roshan Lal

  34. 34.Balram Goyal

  35. 35.Sheela Rani

  36. 36.Bhajan Lal

  37. 37.Indraaj

  38. 38.Puran Singh

  39. 39.Om Parkash

  40. 40.Lal Chand

  41. 41.Rekha Rani

  42. 42.Kailash Rani

  43. 43.Sohan Lal

  44. 44.Hardeep Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.State of Haryana

  3. 3.Ram Lal

  4. 4.Mahinder Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/14938/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition after Haryana's government clarified that the April 22, 2026 amendment to the Public Distribution System Order imposing minimum age requirements would apply only to licenses issued after the amendment, not to existing licenses. The court ordered that any prejudicial action already taken against the petitioners be rectified to allow them to continue operating their distributorships. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14938/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/14938/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition after Haryana's government clarified that the April 22, 2026 amendment to the Public Distribution System Order imposing minimum age requirements would apply only to licenses issued after the amendment, not to existing licenses. The court ordered that any prejudicial action already taken against the petitioners be rectified to allow them to continue operating their distributorships. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case