AMANDEEP SINGH AND ORS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CWP/16182/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Jul-2022

CNR: PHHC010788462022

Filing Number

CWP/31658/2022

Filing Date

22-Jul-2022

Registration No

CWP/16182/2022

Registration Date

26-Jul-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.12 - MISC. PUNJAB ( 738 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMANDEEP SINGH AND ORS

    Adv. TAJINDER PAL SINGH MAKKAR

  2. 2.MOHINDER SINGH

  3. 3.GURBACHAN SINGH

  4. 4.KULWANT SINGH

  5. 5.BALJEET SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

  2. 2.SECRETARY PUNJAB MANDI BOARD

  3. 3.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SRI MUKTSAR SAHIB

  4. 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT

  5. 5.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER PUNJAB MANDI BOARD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Summary of CWP-16182-2022 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition concerning inadequate culverts and water logging on roads in Sri Muktsar Sahib, finding that four years had elapsed and all effective remedial steps had been taken by respondents. The court dismissed the case while permitting petitioners to pursue any available legal remedies if grounds survive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Jul-2022

    Other

  4. 22-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/16182/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP-16182-2022 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition concerning inadequate culverts and water logging on roads in Sri Muktsar Sahib, finding that four years had elapsed and all effective remedial steps had been taken by respondents. The court dismissed the case while permitting petitioners to pursue any available legal remedies if grounds survive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case