SAGAR ALIAS GANDHI vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/26434/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010785992026

Filing Number

CRM-M/36705/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26434/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAGAR ALIAS GANDHI

    Adv. ANITA SHARMA

  2. 2.SAGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.SAGAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M-26434-2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to petitioner Sagar alias Gandhi, accused in FIR No. 252 (filed November 11, 2024) under sections 103(2), 190, 191(3), and 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly participating in a fatal assault on 21-year-old Vishal alias Vishu. The court found no specific attribution to the petitioner—while the deceased sustained four injuries (one incised, three lacerated wounds), none were consistent with fist blows allegedly delivered by the petitioner, and no recovery was effected from him. The court emphasized that co-accused Akash and Sachin had already been granted bail by the same court, establishing parity; further noting arguable issues existed regarding active participation based on medical records. Bail was granted with conditions prohibiting witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26434/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M-26434-2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to petitioner Sagar alias Gandhi, accused in FIR No. 252 (filed November 11, 2024) under sections 103(2), 190, 191(3), and 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly participating in a fatal assault on 21-year-old Vishal alias Vishu. The court found no specific attribution to the petitioner—while the deceased sustained four injuries (one incised, three lacerated wounds), none were consistent with fist blows allegedly delivered by the petitioner, and no recovery was effected from him. The court emphasized that co-accused Akash and Sachin had already been granted bail by the same court, establishing parity; further noting arguable issues existed regarding active participation based on medical records. Bail was granted with conditions prohibiting witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case