TEJ SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/25933/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010778832026

Filing Number

CRM-M/36320/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/25933/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Coram

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TEJ SINGH

    Adv. DHARAMVIR SINGH

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Aman ChaudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Tej Singh in a violent crime case (FIR involving murder, rioting, and arms act violations) where he had already served 3+ years in custody and had been on bail for a year before temporarily absconding due to illness. The court allowed the petition after finding that with 11 more prosecution witnesses remaining to be examined and co-accused already granted bail, further incarceration would violate Article 21 rights, and ordered his release on furnishing bail bonds with a warning that any breach would lead to cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/25933/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Tej Singh in a violent crime case (FIR involving murder, rioting, and arms act violations) where he had already served 3+ years in custody and had been on bail for a year before temporarily absconding due to illness. The court allowed the petition after finding that with 11 more prosecution witnesses remaining to be examined and co-accused already granted bail, further incarceration would violate Article 21 rights, and ordered his release on furnishing bail bonds with a warning that any breach would lead to cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case