STATE BANK OF INDIA vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CWP/14513/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 9(6). Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010774702026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

11th May 2026

e-Filing Number

05-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/28015/2026

Filing Date

06-05-2026

Registration No

CWP/14513/2026

Registration Date

07-05-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI , MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

Coram

MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI , MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

Category

31.11 - FINANCIAL CORPORATION UOI D.B. ( 558 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 9(6)

Petitioner(s)

STATE BANK OF INDIA

Adv. CHANDEEP SINGH

State Bank of India

Respondent(s)

STATE OF PUNJAB

State Bank of India

Sub Registrar

Tehsildar

Lekh Raj

Sunita Rani Wife of Late Sh Lekh Raj

Sunil Sharma Son of Late Lekh Raj

Manish Sharma Son of Late Lekh Raj

Bhupinder Singh Son of Darshan Singh

Deputy Commissioner

Orders

11-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI,MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

Summary: The Punjab & Haryana High Court disposed of SBI's petition seeking removal of land attachment and registration of a sale certificate. The Court accepted the State's undertaking to decide SBI's pending representation (dated 21.02.2025) within two months, thereby disposing the writ petition while granting SBI liberty to challenge any adverse order from the Tehsildar in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Punjab & Haryana High Court disposed of SBI's petition seeking removal of land attachment and registration of a sale certificate. The Court accepted the State's undertaking to decide SBI's pending representation (dated 21.02.2025) within two months, thereby disposing the writ petition while granting SBI liberty to challenge any adverse order from the Tehsildar in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case