MUKESH KUMAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CWP/13495/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010733442026
e-Filing Number
28-04-2026
Filing Number
CWP/26342/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWP/13495/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil
Coram
Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil
Bench Type
Single
Category
58.1 - GOVT SERVICE (HY) ( 705 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUKESH KUMAR AND OTHERS
Adv. AMAN NAIN
-
2.Mukesh Kumar and others
-
3.Director General, Information, Public Relation Cultural Affair
-
4.Harpa
-
5.Satinder
-
6.Manjit Kumar
-
7.Manjee
-
8.Babali
-
9.Vijay Datt
-
10.Alsyas Muhammad
-
11.Charu
-
12.Satish Kumar
-
13.Gaurav
-
14.Promila Rani
-
15.Arun Kumar
-
16.Preeti Chauhan
-
17.Kirshna
-
18.Naveen Kumar
-
19.Renu Nain
-
20.Narveer
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
-
2.Mukesh Kumar and others
-
3.Director General, Information, Public Relation Cultural Affair
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Director General of Information, Public Relations and Cultural Affairs (Respondent No.2) to consider and decide the petitioners' representation dated 13.01.2026 for regularization of their Data Entry Operator services within eight weeks, in light of Supreme Court precedent in Jaggo's case and relevant High Court judgments, while providing the petitioners an opportunity to be heard before passing a speaking order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/13495/2026
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Director General of Information, Public Relations and Cultural Affairs (Respondent No.2) to consider and decide the petitioners' representation dated 13.01.2026 for regularization of their Data Entry Operator services within eight weeks, in light of Supreme Court precedent in Jaggo's case and relevant High Court judgments, while providing the petitioners an opportunity to be heard before passing a speaking order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts