CHANDER PARKASH (SINCE DECEASED) THR HIS LR vs DR. J. GANESA, IAS AND ORS. — COCP/1781/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10/12. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010640882026

Filing Number

COCP/22833/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

COCP/1781/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 10/12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDER PARKASH (SINCE DECEASED) THR HIS LR

    Adv. JAI SINGH YADAV

  2. 2.J GANESAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DR. J. GANESA, IAS AND ORS.

  2. 2.J GANESAN

  3. 3.SUMIT GOYAL

  4. 4.BARJESH GAIND

  5. 5.SANJAY YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a contempt petition filed by retired lineman Chander Parkash against HVPNL for allegedly violating a 2025 order directing payment of third financial upgradation benefits within three months. The court found substantial compliance after HVPNL remitted Rs. 4,57,938 via cheque on 08.5.2026, which the petitioner received and acknowledged, rendering the contempt proceedings moot and accordingly discharged the rule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/1781/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a contempt petition filed by retired lineman Chander Parkash against HVPNL for allegedly violating a 2025 order directing payment of third financial upgradation benefits within three months. The court found substantial compliance after HVPNL remitted Rs. 4,57,938 via cheque on 08.5.2026, which the petitioner received and acknowledged, rendering the contempt proceedings moot and accordingly discharged the rule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case