M/S AIRPLAZA RETAIL HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/11491/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section article 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010629002026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

e-Filing Number

16-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/22431/2026

Filing Date

16-04-2026

Registration No

CWP/11491/2026

Registration Date

16-04-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER

Coram

MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER

Bench Type

Single

Category

31.2 - MUNICIPAL & PANCHAYAT LAWS ( 559 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section article 226
Burn Company and Indian Standard Wagon Company (Nationalisation) Act

Petitioner(s)

M/S AIRPLAZA RETAIL HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED

Adv. VISHAL GARG NARWANA

State of Haryana And others

Respondent(s)

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

State of Haryana And others

Director Urban Local Bodies

Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Hisar

Executive Engineer, Municipal Corporation,

M/s Suncity Entertainment Private Limited, Suncity Mall

Orders

11-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER

Case Summary: CWP/11491/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed M/s Airplaza Retail Holdings Private Limited (tenant) to withdraw its petition challenging a municipal notice directing vacation of a sealed floor in a Hisar building/mall, after noting that the building owner had already filed a statutory appeal against the sealing order. The court permitted withdrawal with liberty for the petitioner to file a fresh petition if necessary, effectively disposing of the matter without deciding the substantive issue on whether the disputed floor constitutes a "basement." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/11491/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed M/s Airplaza Retail Holdings Private Limited (tenant) to withdraw its petition challenging a municipal notice directing vacation of a sealed floor in a Hisar building/mall, after noting that the building owner had already filed a statutory appeal against the sealing order. The court permitted withdrawal with liberty for the petitioner to file a fresh petition if necessary, effectively disposing of the matter without deciding the substantive issue on whether the disputed floor constitutes a "basement." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case