M/S AIRPLAZA RETAIL HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/11491/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section article 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010629002026
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
16-04-2026
Filing Number
CWP/22431/2026
Filing Date
16-04-2026
Registration No
CWP/11491/2026
Registration Date
16-04-2026
Judge
MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER
Coram
MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER
Bench Type
Single
Category
31.2 - MUNICIPAL & PANCHAYAT LAWS ( 559 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
11th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S AIRPLAZA RETAIL HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. VISHAL GARG NARWANA
State of Haryana And others
Respondent(s)
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
State of Haryana And others
Director Urban Local Bodies
Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Hisar
Executive Engineer, Municipal Corporation,
M/s Suncity Entertainment Private Limited, Suncity Mall
Orders
Case Summary: CWP/11491/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed M/s Airplaza Retail Holdings Private Limited (tenant) to withdraw its petition challenging a municipal notice directing vacation of a sealed floor in a Hisar building/mall, after noting that the building owner had already filed a statutory appeal against the sealing order. The court permitted withdrawal with liberty for the petitioner to file a fresh petition if necessary, effectively disposing of the matter without deciding the substantive issue on whether the disputed floor constitutes a "basement." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CWP/11491/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed M/s Airplaza Retail Holdings Private Limited (tenant) to withdraw its petition challenging a municipal notice directing vacation of a sealed floor in a Hisar building/mall, after noting that the building owner had already filed a statutory appeal against the sealing order. The court permitted withdrawal with liberty for the petitioner to file a fresh petition if necessary, effectively disposing of the matter without deciding the substantive issue on whether the disputed floor constitutes a "basement." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts