MAHAVEER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/11849/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010620302026

e-Filing Number

10-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/22120/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11849/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Category

68.1 - GOVT SERVICE (PB)-SB ( 771 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHAVEER

    Adv. VISHAL MITTAL

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  3. 3.Shiv Kumar S/o Om Parkash Age 45 Years Resident of village Sito Gunu Tehsil Abohar District Fazilka

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  3. 3.Shiv Kumar S/o Om Parkash Age 45 Years Resident of village Sito Gunu Tehsil Abohar District Fazilka

  4. 4.Divisional Forest Officer at District Ferozpur Department of Wildlife Preservation Punjab

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a petition by employees seeking regularization of services under a 2023 State policy and equivalent pay with allowances. Without examining the merits, the court directed the State to expeditiously consider and decide the petitioners' pending representation (dated 01.02.2026) within two months, with a reasoned order and hearing opportunity, and communicate the decision to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11849/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a petition by employees seeking regularization of services under a 2023 State policy and equivalent pay with allowances. Without examining the merits, the court directed the State to expeditiously consider and decide the petitioners' pending representation (dated 01.02.2026) within two months, with a reasoned order and hearing opportunity, and communicate the decision to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case