TAMANNA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CRWP/4202/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010616222026

Filing Number

CRWP/27823/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRWP/4202/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAMANNA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. SHARNDEEP SINGH

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.CP PANCHKULA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.CP PANCHKULA

  4. 4.SHO (Station House Officer) SEC 16 PANCHKULA

  5. 5.ARJUN

  6. 6.RAJINDER

  7. 7.FULL KUMAR

  8. 8.SUNIL

  9. 9.RANBIR

  10. 10.VIKASH

  11. 11.BALA

  12. 12.SANGEET

  13. 13.WARSHA

  14. 14.ANJU

  15. 15.ROHIT

  16. 16.GOVINDA

  17. 17.JAGMATI

  18. 18.RAJO

  19. 19.JAIPAL

  20. 20.RAJU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition filed by Tamanna and another seeking protection of life and liberty. Justice Manisha Batra directed the Commissioner of Police, Panchkula to decide the petitioners' representation dated 09.04.2026 within one month by passing a reasoned order, and mandated that official respondents provide adequate security to the petitioners if any threat is found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/4202/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition filed by Tamanna and another seeking protection of life and liberty. Justice Manisha Batra directed the Commissioner of Police, Panchkula to decide the petitioners' representation dated 09.04.2026 within one month by passing a reasoned order, and mandated that official respondents provide adequate security to the petitioners if any threat is found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case