M/S SHRI SAI ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CRM-M/20149/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010598882026

Filing Number

CRM-M/26993/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/20149/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S SHRI SAI ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS

    Adv. VISHAL GARG NARWANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed M/S Shri Sai Enterprises' petition to quash FIR No. 80 dated 18.04.2025 (registered at Police Station Sector 6, Dharuhera, District Rewari under sections 316(2), 318(2), 318(4), 351(2), 338, 336(3), and 340(2) BNS) based on a voluntary compromise between the parties. The Magistrate confirmed the compromise was effected without coercion or undue influence, and all parties (State counsel, complainants' counsel, and respondent No. 9) did not dispute the compromise, making continued proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/20149/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed M/S Shri Sai Enterprises' petition to quash FIR No. 80 dated 18.04.2025 (registered at Police Station Sector 6, Dharuhera, District Rewari under sections 316(2), 318(2), 318(4), 351(2), 338, 336(3), and 340(2) BNS) based on a voluntary compromise between the parties. The Magistrate confirmed the compromise was effected without coercion or undue influence, and all parties (State counsel, complainants' counsel, and respondent No. 9) did not dispute the compromise, making continued proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case