NEELANCHAL SUNAMUDI @SONU vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/20038/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010595712026

Filing Number

CRM-M/26680/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/20038/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEELANCHAL SUNAMUDI @SONU

    Adv. KARAN JANGRA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M/20038/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Neelanchal Sunamudi's bail petition in an NDPS case involving 24kg of ganja. Though no contraband was directly recovered from the petitioner, the court found prima facie evidence through co-accused disclosure statements, mobile phone evidence of ganja photographs, and bank transactions totaling ₹1,60,000. The court denied regular bail at this stage due to the petitioner being an Orissa resident and ongoing investigation, but granted liberty to file a fresh bail petition after investigation completion and challan submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/20038/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M/20038/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Neelanchal Sunamudi's bail petition in an NDPS case involving 24kg of ganja. Though no contraband was directly recovered from the petitioner, the court found prima facie evidence through co-accused disclosure statements, mobile phone evidence of ganja photographs, and bank transactions totaling ₹1,60,000. The court denied regular bail at this stage due to the petitioner being an Orissa resident and ongoing investigation, but granted liberty to file a fresh bail petition after investigation completion and challan submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case