CHANDAN KUMAR ALIAS CHANDAN NEHORIA vs HDFC BANK LIMITED AND ANOTHER — CWP/10822/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010584512026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/20775/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/10822/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Bench Type

Double

Category

31.11 - FINANCIAL CORPORATION UOI D.B. ( 558 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDAN KUMAR ALIAS CHANDAN NEHORIA

    Adv. SANDEEP KUMAR BOKOLIA

  2. 2.HDFC Bank Limited and another

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HDFC BANK LIMITED AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.HDFC Bank Limited and another

  3. 3.HDFC Bank Limited

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/10822/2026 The petitioner sought to set aside HDFC Bank's e-auction sale notice issued under the SARFAESI Act and requested consideration of a One Time Settlement proposal. The bank's counsel objected to the writ petition's maintainability, arguing the proper remedy was the Debts Recovery Tribunal under SARFAESI Act. The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue the appropriate statutory remedy available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/10822/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/10822/2026 The petitioner sought to set aside HDFC Bank's e-auction sale notice issued under the SARFAESI Act and requested consideration of a One Time Settlement proposal. The bank's counsel objected to the writ petition's maintainability, arguing the proper remedy was the Debts Recovery Tribunal under SARFAESI Act. The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue the appropriate statutory remedy available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case