KULDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER vs PATHANKOT IMPROVEMENT TRUST AND OTHERS — CR/3158/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010583852026

Filing Number

CR/20727/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CR/3158/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. SHRUTI

  2. 2.PATHANKOT IMPROVEMENT TRUST THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN

  3. 3.PARDEEP SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATHANKOT IMPROVEMENT TRUST AND OTHERS

  2. 2.PATHANKOT IMPROVEMENT TRUST THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Virinder AggarwalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the civil revision petition by modifying the lower court's order for land demarcation. The court appointed an independent court-appointed observer (Advocate Tarun Jindal) to oversee the demarcation process conducted by revenue officials, with all parties consenting to this arrangement. The petitioners were directed to pay the observer's fee of Rs. 75,000, and the demarcation proceedings were to be video-recorded for transparency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/3158/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the civil revision petition by modifying the lower court's order for land demarcation. The court appointed an independent court-appointed observer (Advocate Tarun Jindal) to oversee the demarcation process conducted by revenue officials, with all parties consenting to this arrangement. The petitioners were directed to pay the observer's fee of Rs. 75,000, and the demarcation proceedings were to be video-recorded for transparency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case