PRINCE ALIAS SAHIL ALIAS PISHU vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/18517/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: PHHC010540762026
Filing Number
CRM-M/23957/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/18517/2026
Registration Date
02-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel
Coram
Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 12-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRINCE ALIAS SAHIL ALIAS PISHU
Adv. Ranvir Parashar
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Prince @ Sahil @ Pishu, who was arrested for allegedly participating in a group stabbing of a 16-year-old student. The court found that after three months and 12 days of incarceration, with no evidence of flight risk or evidence tampering, and given that charges had not yet been framed and no prosecution witnesses had been examined, further detention was unwarranted. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions including passport deposit, maintaining contact with investigators, and non-interference with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/18517/2026
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Prince @ Sahil @ Pishu, who was arrested for allegedly participating in a group stabbing of a 16-year-old student. The court found that after three months and 12 days of incarceration, with no evidence of flight risk or evidence tampering, and given that charges had not yet been framed and no prosecution witnesses had been examined, further detention was unwarranted. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions including passport deposit, maintaining contact with investigators, and non-interference with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts