MADAN LAL RN MOUDGILL,PAWAN GAUTAM. vs THURO ETC. — RSA/4289/2000

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Oct-2012

CNR: PHHC010447832000

Filing Number

RSA/4289/2000

Filing Date

15-Aug-2207

Registration No

RSA/4289/2000

Registration Date

15-Aug-2207

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

26 - RSA ( 496 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADAN LAL RN MOUDGILL,PAWAN GAUTAM.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THURO ETC.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Aug-2207

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/4289/2000

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal (RSA-4289-2000) for want of prosecution. Of the six appellants, three had died without legal representatives being added to the case, one served appellant failed to appear, and two appellants could not be located. The court granted liberty to revive the appeal if any surviving cause of action remains. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 20-Dec-2013

    Mr. Justice G.C. Garg (Retd.)

  5. 23-Apr-2013

    —

  6. 23-Apr-2013

    —

    Mr. Justice Gurmit Ram

  7. 28-Feb-2013

    Mr. Justice G.C. Garg (Retd.)

  8. 28-Feb-2013

    —

    Mr. Justice Gurmit Ram

  9. 20-Dec-2012

    —

    Mr. Justice Gurmit Ram

  10. 09-Nov-2012

    Mr. Justice G.C. Garg (Retd.)

  11. 09-Nov-2012

    —

    Mr. Justice Gurmit Ram

  12. 08-Oct-2012

    Mr. Justice G.C. Garg (Retd.)

  13. 08-Oct-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal (RSA-4289-2000) for want of prosecution. Of the six appellants, three had died without legal representatives being added to the case, one served appellant failed to appear, and two appellants could not be located. The court granted liberty to revive the appeal if any surviving cause of action remains. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case