(O&M) ASHOK KUMAR vs ROSHAN LAL — FAO/4887/2002
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC010404922002
Filing Number
FAO/4887/2002
Filing Date
27-Sep-2002
Registration No
FAO/4887/2002
Registration Date
27-Sep-2002
Judge
Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh Grewal
Coram
Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh Grewal
Bench Type
Single
Category
500.21 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 886 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.(O&M) ASHOK KUMAR
Adv. RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.ROSHAN LAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh GrewalView PDF
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution after the parties failed to appear for the third successive hearing date, despite proper notice to both counsel. The court found the parties uninterested in pursuing the case concerning a 2011 burning incident, but granted the appellant liberty to file an application for revival of the appeal if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Jan-2019
—
Mrs. Justice Archana Puri
-
30-Oct-2018
—
Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal
-
10-Oct-2018
—
Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal
-
02-Jul-2018
—
Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal
-
07-May-2018
—
Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal
-
08-Jan-2018
—
Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal
-
11-Jul-2017
—
Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj
-
09-Jan-2017
—
Mr. Justice Girish Agnihotri
-
04-Jul-2016
—
Mr. Justice Ramendra Jain
-
05-Jan-2016
—
Mr. Justice Ramendra Jain
-
10-Aug-2015
—
Mr. Justice A.B. Chaudhari
-
02-Mar-2015
—
Mr. Justice R.C. Kathuria (Retd.)
-
05-Jan-2015
—
Mr. Justice Jitendra Chauhan
-
25-Sep-2014
—
Mr. Justice Jitendra Chauhan
-
01-Aug-2014
—
Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh
-
30-Jun-2014
—
Mr. Justice Sharan Jeet Singh Grewal
-
08-Jan-2014
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Sep-2002
Case filed
Registration No. FAO/4887/2002
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution after the parties failed to appear for the third successive hearing date, despite proper notice to both counsel. The court found the parties uninterested in pursuing the case concerning a 2011 burning incident, but granted the appellant liberty to file an application for revival of the appeal if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts