SACHIN BALI AND ANOTHER vs JOGINDER PAL — CR/2372/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010377292026

Filing Number

CR/12578/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

CR/2372/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SACHIN BALI AND ANOTHER

    Adv. DINESH NAGAR

  2. 2.JOGINDER PAL

  3. 3.JATINDER SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JOGINDER PAL

  2. 2.JOGINDER PAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Amarinder Singh GrewalView PDF

    Case Summary: CR-2372-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed the revision petition filed by Sachin Bali and another against the trial court's dismissal of their ad interim injunction application. The petitioners sought to restrain the respondent from interfering with their property possession and transferring it. The High Court set aside the trial court's order dismissing the application as infructuous and directed the Civil Judge to decide the injunction application on merits expeditiously upon the respondent's appearance, noting that the application had not yet received substantive consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/2372/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR-2372-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed the revision petition filed by Sachin Bali and another against the trial court's dismissal of their ad interim injunction application. The petitioners sought to restrain the respondent from interfering with their property possession and transferring it. The High Court set aside the trial court's order dismissing the application as infructuous and directed the Civil Judge to decide the injunction application on merits expeditiously upon the respondent's appearance, noting that the application had not yet received substantive consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case