CHANDRAVIR SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CWP/6826/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010367062026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

CWP/12205/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

CWP/6826/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Coram

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.11 - SERVICE-EDU-HARYANA(SR.EDUCATION DEPT) ( 706 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRAVIR SINGH

    Adv. BINDU TANWAR

  2. 2.State of Haryana and another

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.State of Haryana and another

  3. 3.District Education Officer, Government of Haryana, District Palwal, Haryana

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Tribhuvan DahiyaView PDF

    Summary of CWP-6826-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Chandravir Singh's petition challenging a misconduct memorandum dated 07.01.2026 from the State of Haryana. The court found that after the petitioner submitted a properly signed reply to the charges, the State appointed an enquiry officer to investigate the misconduct allegations. The petition was disposed with liberty to the petitioner to raise all appropriate pleas during the disciplinary enquiry proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6826/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP-6826-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Chandravir Singh's petition challenging a misconduct memorandum dated 07.01.2026 from the State of Haryana. The court found that after the petitioner submitted a properly signed reply to the charges, the State appointed an enquiry officer to investigate the misconduct allegations. The petition was disposed with liberty to the petitioner to raise all appropriate pleas during the disciplinary enquiry proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case