SUNIL KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/8416/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010244192026

Filing Number

CRM-M/8928/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/8416/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Coram

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL KUMAR

    Adv. HARSH JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Aman ChaudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/8416/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Sunil Kumar in FIR No. 349 (Sections 108 & 3(5) BNS) relating to allegedly issuing six blank signed cheques. The court found the allegations lacked justification, as the cheques were never dishonored, and accepted that the petitioner had fully cooperated with the investigating agency. The anticipatory bail was made absolute subject to standard conditions under Section 482(2) BNSS, with a warning that the State may seek cancellation if the petitioner fails to join or cooperate with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/8416/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/8416/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Sunil Kumar in FIR No. 349 (Sections 108 & 3(5) BNS) relating to allegedly issuing six blank signed cheques. The court found the allegations lacked justification, as the cheques were never dishonored, and accepted that the petitioner had fully cooperated with the investigating agency. The anticipatory bail was made absolute subject to standard conditions under Section 482(2) BNSS, with a warning that the State may seek cancellation if the petitioner fails to join or cooperate with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case