PRITAM SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL HARYANA — CWP/3780/2020

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Feb-2020

CNR: PHHC010177462020

Filing Number

CWP/8248/2020

Filing Date

07-Feb-2020

Registration No

CWP/3780/2020

Registration Date

11-Feb-2020

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.26 - SERVICE-ENGINEERING-HARYANA(PWD,B&R&PUBLIC HEALTH ( 716 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRITAM SINGH AND OTHERS

    Adv. TEJPAL DHULL

  2. 2.MOHINDER SINGH

  3. 3.BALWAN SINGH

  4. 4.GAJE SINGH

  5. 5.SARJEET SINGH

  6. 6.AJAY KUMAR

  7. 7.RISHI RAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL HARYANA

  2. 2.ENGINEER IN CHIEF, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT HARYANA

  3. 3.GENERAL MANAGER, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT HARYANA

  4. 4.SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    The court allowed the writ petition filed by Canal Patwari contract appointees seeking regularization based on policy decisions dated 18.06.2014 and 14.08.2014. The State offered no objection to the petitioners' proposal. The court directed the respondent authority to examine individual regularization claims in light of the Supreme Court's dictum in the Madan Singh case, with all grounds and pleas to be considered at final adjudication after affording a hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Feb-2020

    Other

  4. 07-Feb-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3780/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the writ petition filed by Canal Patwari contract appointees seeking regularization based on policy decisions dated 18.06.2014 and 14.08.2014. The State offered no objection to the petitioners' proposal. The court directed the respondent authority to examine individual regularization claims in light of the Supreme Court's dictum in the Madan Singh case, with all grounds and pleas to be considered at final adjudication after affording a hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case