Raj Kishor Singh vs The State of Bihar through Collector, Buxar, namely Anshul Agrawal — MJC/67/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th June 2026.
CNR: BRHC011354582025
e-Filing Number
24-12-2025
Filing Number
MJC/30928/2025
Filing Date
24-Dec-2025
Registration No
MJC/67/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Coram
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
RESTORATION-SJ ( 200 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raj Kishor Singh
Adv. Nafisuzzoha
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar through Collector, Buxar, namely Anshul Agrawal
-
2.The Collector-cum-District Magistrate,
-
3.The Addl. Collector,
-
4.The Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
-
5.The Circle Officer,
-
6.The Circle Inspector,
-
7.The Halka Karamchari,
-
8.The Anchal Amin,
-
9.Kamal Yadav,
-
10.Subhash Singh Yadav,
-
11.Ram Nath Singh,
-
12.Lalji Yadav,
-
13.Ram Kishun Yadav
-
14.Hiralal Ydav
-
15.Kunj Bihari,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar ShahView PDF
The Patna High Court granted Raj Kishor Singh's petition to restore his earlier miscellaneous case (MJC No. 299 of 2025), which had been dismissed for default due to non-compliance with a peremptory order dated 16.05.2025. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah accepted the petitioner's explanation that an advocate's clerk's mistake caused the failure to remove defects timely, and directed restoration of the original petition to the file subject to removal of registry-pointed defects within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
For Orders (On Office Notes) - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
24-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/67/2026
The Patna High Court granted Raj Kishor Singh's petition to restore his earlier miscellaneous case (MJC No. 299 of 2025), which had been dismissed for default due to non-compliance with a peremptory order dated 16.05.2025. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah accepted the petitioner's explanation that an advocate's clerk's mistake caused the failure to remove defects timely, and directed restoration of the original petition to the file subject to removal of registry-pointed defects within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts