Dr. Onkareshwar Prasad vs The State of Bihar — MJC/1384/2019
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010346592019
Filing Number
MJC/13421/2019
Filing Date
01-Apr-2019
Registration No
MJC/1384/2019
Registration Date
01-Apr-2019
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dr. Onkareshwar Prasad
Adv. Vikas Mohan,Mukeshwar Dayal,Mukeshwar Dayal, ,Mukeshwar Dayal
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
Adv. ,Mr. Ranjan Kumar,Sanjay Pandey,PRACHI PALLAVI,Ram Yash Singh 1123
-
2.Sri Subhas Sharma
-
3.Sri Manish Kumar Verma
-
4.Sri S. Siddarth
-
5.Ms Mani. K
-
6.Sri Amir Subhani
-
7.The Bihar Public Service Commission
-
8.Sri Kehsav Ranjan Prasad
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Summary of MJC/1384/2019 Dr. Onkareshwar Prasad filed a contempt petition against Bihar government officials for allegedly violating a January 17, 2019 order from Civil Writ Case No. 3678 of 2011. The Patna High Court, while hearing the petition on May 6, 2026, noted that the Planning and Development Department had rejected the petitioner's claim via a reasoned order dated April 3, 2026, and disposed of the contempt petition, granting the petitioner liberty to pursue any remaining grievance through appropriate channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Sep-2019
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey
-
25-Sep-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2019
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/1384/2019
Summary of MJC/1384/2019 Dr. Onkareshwar Prasad filed a contempt petition against Bihar government officials for allegedly violating a January 17, 2019 order from Civil Writ Case No. 3678 of 2011. The Patna High Court, while hearing the petition on May 6, 2026, noted that the Planning and Development Department had rejected the petitioner's claim via a reasoned order dated April 3, 2026, and disposed of the contempt petition, granting the petitioner liberty to pursue any remaining grievance through appropriate channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts