Marni Devi vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/4375/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010023532025
e-Filing Number
09-01-2025
Filing Number
CWJC/544/2025
Filing Date
10-Jan-2025
Registration No
CWJC/4375/2025
Registration Date
18-Mar-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 6700 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Marni Devi
Adv. Santosh Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.The Deputy Collector,
-
3.The Circle Officer,
-
4.Superintendent of Police (SP),
-
5.The Station-In-Charge,
-
6.Bhuvneshar Rai,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: CWJC/4375/2025 - Marni Devi v. State of Bihar The Patna High Court disposed of Marni Devi's writ petition seeking mandamus to recover land in Sitamarhi from which she was forcibly dispossessed, despite holding a 2012 court decree in her favor. Rather than issuing direct relief, the court allowed the petitioner to approach the Circle Officer, Sonbarsa with proper documentation, with the State undertaking to hear all parties and decide the matter according to law by year-end. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2025
For Orders (On Office Notes) - Fresh Cases
Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra
-
19-Mar-2025
For Orders (On Office Notes)
The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima Defective Cases Cause List
-
17-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/4375/2025
Case Summary: CWJC/4375/2025 - Marni Devi v. State of Bihar The Patna High Court disposed of Marni Devi's writ petition seeking mandamus to recover land in Sitamarhi from which she was forcibly dispossessed, despite holding a 2012 court decree in her favor. Rather than issuing direct relief, the court allowed the petitioner to approach the Circle Officer, Sonbarsa with proper documentation, with the State undertaking to hear all parties and decide the matter according to law by year-end. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts