KURESHU PRADHAN vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/18295/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th June 2026.
CNR: ODHC010422682026
Filing Number
WP(C)/25521/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/18295/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
RETIRAL BENEFITS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KURESHU PRADHAN
Adv. SATYA RANJAN PATI,D.PATI, S.S.S.SWAIN, L.BEHURA,D.PATI, S.S.S.SWAIN, L.BEHURA, D.PATI, S.S.S.SWAIN, L.BEHURA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.REGISTRAR,COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES
-
3.DY REGISTRAR,COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES
-
4.ASST REGISTRAR,COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES
-
5.SECRETARY-CUM- CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BERHAMPUR COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED , BERHAMPUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Orissa disposed of Kureshu Pradhan's writ petition seeking release of gratuity and retiral benefits by granting liberty to file a fresh representation before the Registrar of Cooperative Societies (Opp. Party No.5) within two weeks with supporting documents. The court directed that Opp. Party No.5 decide the representation within three months of receipt and communicate the decision to the petitioner, rather than issuing the rule Nisi sought for immediate payment of benefits and statutory interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/18295/2026
Summary: The High Court of Orissa disposed of Kureshu Pradhan's writ petition seeking release of gratuity and retiral benefits by granting liberty to file a fresh representation before the Registrar of Cooperative Societies (Opp. Party No.5) within two weeks with supporting documents. The court directed that Opp. Party No.5 decide the representation within three months of receipt and communicate the decision to the petitioner, rather than issuing the rule Nisi sought for immediate payment of benefits and statutory interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts