MINATI ROUT vs ZONAL MANAGER, UCO BANK, BALASORE — WP(C)/10784/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: ODHC010263682026
Filing Number
WP(C)/15732/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/10784/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash
Coram
Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MINATI ROUT
Adv. BINAYA KUMAR MOHANTY,J.SAHU, D.D.MOHANTY, S.M.MOHANTY, K.N.MOHAPATRA,J.SAHU, D.D.MOHANTY, S.M.MOHANTY, K.N.MOHAPATRA, J.SAHU, D.D.MOHANTY, S.M.MOHANTY, K.N.MOHAPATRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.ZONAL MANAGER, UCO BANK, BALASORE
-
2.REGIONAL MANAGER, CUTTACK
-
3.CHIEF MANAGER CUM AO, UCO BANK, BHUBANESWAR
-
4.BRANCH MANAGER, UCO BANK, COLLECTORATE BRANCH, JAGATSINGHPUR
-
5.SAMBEET PRIYARANJAN
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Dixit K.s.,mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Orissa granted interim relief to petitioner Minati Rout in her writ petition against UCO Bank. The court directed the bank to refrain from issuing the Sale Certificate or confirming the auction sale of her residential property (held on 26.03.2026) until the next hearing, finding an arguable case in her favor after she deposited ₹27,45,000 following the auction. The matter has been called for immediate hearing after service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/10784/2026
Summary: The High Court of Orissa granted interim relief to petitioner Minati Rout in her writ petition against UCO Bank. The court directed the bank to refrain from issuing the Sale Certificate or confirming the auction sale of her residential property (held on 26.03.2026) until the next hearing, finding an arguable case in her favor after she deposited ₹27,45,000 following the auction. The matter has been called for immediate hearing after service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts