MINATI ROUT vs ZONAL MANAGER, UCO BANK, BALASORE — WP(C)/10784/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: ODHC010263682026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WP(C)/15732/2026

Filing Date

09-04-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/10784/2026

Registration Date

09-04-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Coram

MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

MINATI ROUT

Adv. BINAYA KUMAR MOHANTY,J.SAHU, D.D.MOHANTY, S.M.MOHANTY, K.N.MOHAPATRA,J.SAHU, D.D.MOHANTY, S.M.MOHANTY, K.N.MOHAPATRA, J.SAHU, D.D.MOHANTY, S.M.MOHANTY, K.N.MOHAPATRA

Respondent(s)

ZONAL MANAGER, UCO BANK, BALASORE

REGIONAL MANAGER, CUTTACK

CHIEF MANAGER CUM AO, UCO BANK, BHUBANESWAR

BRANCH MANAGER, UCO BANK, COLLECTORATE BRANCH, JAGATSINGHPUR

SAMBEET PRIYARANJAN

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

09-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

09-04-2026
MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S.,MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Summary: The High Court of Orissa granted interim relief to petitioner Minati Rout in her writ petition against UCO Bank. The court directed the bank to refrain from issuing the Sale Certificate or confirming the auction sale of her residential property (held on 26.03.2026) until the next hearing, finding an arguable case in her favor after she deposited ₹27,45,000 following the auction. The matter has been called for immediate hearing after service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Orissa granted interim relief to petitioner Minati Rout in her writ petition against UCO Bank. The court directed the bank to refrain from issuing the Sale Certificate or confirming the auction sale of her residential property (held on 26.03.2026) until the next hearing, finding an arguable case in her favor after she deposited ₹27,45,000 following the auction. The matter has been called for immediate hearing after service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case