MOTILAL PATTANAIK vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/10591/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010242602026

Filing Number

WP(C)/14404/2026

Filing Date

31-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/10591/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

PROMOTION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOTILAL PATTANAIK

    Adv. SIDDHARTH GOUTAM DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

  3. 3.PRINCIPAL POLICE TRAINING COLLEGE

  4. 4.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KALAHANDI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of Motilal Pattanaik's writ petition seeking a mandamus to complete his training at PTC, Anugul, by granting him liberty to file a fresh representation before the State within three weeks with supporting documents. The court directed the State to pass a lawful decision on the representation within three months of receipt and communicate the order to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/10591/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of Motilal Pattanaik's writ petition seeking a mandamus to complete his training at PTC, Anugul, by granting him liberty to file a fresh representation before the State within three weeks with supporting documents. The court directed the State to pass a lawful decision on the representation within three months of receipt and communicate the order to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case