DIBYAJYOTI RAY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C) /9911/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227,. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

CNR: ODHC010213972026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP(C) /12605/2026

Filing Date

23-03-2026

Registration No

WP(C) /9911/2026

Registration Date

30-03-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

Coram

MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

SALARY/ARREAR SALARY ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

31st March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 Section 226,227,

Petitioner(s)

DIBYAJYOTI RAY

Adv. BIJAYA KUMAR BEHERA 1,DR.B.N.RAY,DR.B.N.RAY, DR.B.N.RAY

Respondent(s)

STATE OF ODISHA

THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION,BHUBANESWAR

THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, BHUBANESWAR

THE SUB-COLLECTOR JAJPUR AND PRESIDENT, G B OF CHITALO DEGREE MAHAVIDYALAYA ,JAJPUR

THE PRINCIPAL- CUM-SECRETARY CHITALO DRGREE MAHAVIDYAIAYA, JAJPUR

THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION,BHUBANESWAR

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

31-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

31-03-2026
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition and directed the Regional Director of Education, Bhubaneswar to consider the petitioner Dibyajyoti Ray's pending representation within eight weeks, passing a speaking and reasoned order. The petitioner had sought outstanding salary arrears with increments, EPF deductions, and inclusion under the government's HIMS scheme for higher education benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition and directed the Regional Director of Education, Bhubaneswar to consider the petitioner Dibyajyoti Ray's pending representation within eight weeks, passing a speaking and reasoned order. The petitioner had sought outstanding salary arrears with increments, EPF deductions, and inclusion under the government's HIMS scheme for higher education benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case