DIBYAJYOTI RAY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/9911/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010213972026

Filing Number

WP(C)/12605/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/9911/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Coram

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

SALARY/ARREAR SALARY ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIBYAJYOTI RAY

    Adv. BIJAYA KUMAR BEHERA 1,DR.B.N.RAY,DR.B.N.RAY, DR.B.N.RAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION,BHUBANESWAR

  3. 3.THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, BHUBANESWAR

  4. 4.THE SUB-COLLECTOR JAJPUR AND PRESIDENT, G B OF CHITALO DEGREE MAHAVIDYALAYA ,JAJPUR

  5. 5.THE PRINCIPAL- CUM-SECRETARY CHITALO DRGREE MAHAVIDYAIAYA, JAJPUR

  6. 6.THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION,BHUBANESWAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition and directed the Regional Director of Education, Bhubaneswar to consider the petitioner Dibyajyoti Ray's pending representation within eight weeks, passing a speaking and reasoned order. The petitioner had sought outstanding salary arrears with increments, EPF deductions, and inclusion under the government's HIMS scheme for higher education benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/9911/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition and directed the Regional Director of Education, Bhubaneswar to consider the petitioner Dibyajyoti Ray's pending representation within eight weeks, passing a speaking and reasoned order. The petitioner had sought outstanding salary arrears with increments, EPF deductions, and inclusion under the government's HIMS scheme for higher education benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case