JOGESWAR MEHER vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/9389/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010205192026

Filing Number

WP(C)/12087/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/9389/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Coram

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JOGESWAR MEHER

    Adv. JYOTIRMAY GUPTA,P.P.RAO, S.K.SAHOO, L.B.M.CHAND, S.SAHOO, S.GUPTA,P.P.RAO, S.K.SAHOO, L.B.M.CHAND, S.SAHOO, S.GUPTA, P.P.RAO, S.K.SAHOO, L.B.M.CHAND, S.SAHOO, S.GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.STATE PROJECT DIRECT, OSEPA

  3. 3.COLLECTOR-CUM-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BARGARH

  4. 4.DISTRICT PROJECT CO-ORDINATOR, SSA, BARGARH COLLECTORIATE

  5. 5.BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, JHARBANDH BLOCK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of Jogeswar Meher's writ petition seeking reinstatement as a Junior Teacher, directing the Collector of Bargarh to consider his pending representation within eight weeks and issue a reasoned order, with decision to be communicated within ten days thereafter. The court's decision was based on the limited nature of grievance and consent of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/9389/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of Jogeswar Meher's writ petition seeking reinstatement as a Junior Teacher, directing the Collector of Bargarh to consider his pending representation within eight weeks and issue a reasoned order, with decision to be communicated within ten days thereafter. The court's decision was based on the limited nature of grievance and consent of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case