SUJIT KUMAR NAYAK M/S.KSHIROD KU.ROUT vs BHANUMATI MAJHI, TAHASILDAR, KANIKA, RAJKANIKA,KENDRAPARA — CONTC/1447/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--Dropped on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010155602026

Filing Number

CONTC/9021/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

CONTC/1447/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 8 )

Sub-Category

OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dropped

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUJIT KUMAR NAYAK M/S.KSHIROD KU.ROUT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHANUMATI MAJHI, TAHASILDAR, KANIKA, RAJKANIKA,KENDRAPARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MishraView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Orissa dismissed the contempt proceeding (CONTC No.1447 of 2026) after finding that Demarcation Case No.09 of 2023 had already been disallowed on 19.04.2024 because the disputed land fell under Ceiling Surplus. The petitioner's writ petition was based on a misunderstanding, as he was not informed of the case's dismissal and mistakenly believed it was still pending. The court directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum if aggrieved by the original dismissal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MishraView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONTC/1447/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Orissa dismissed the contempt proceeding (CONTC No.1447 of 2026) after finding that Demarcation Case No.09 of 2023 had already been disallowed on 19.04.2024 because the disputed land fell under Ceiling Surplus. The petitioner's writ petition was based on a misunderstanding, as he was not informed of the case's dismissal and mistakenly believed it was still pending. The court directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum if aggrieved by the original dismissal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case