SUSIL KUMAR BISWAL vs PUSPITA ROUT — CRLMP/254/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010078622026
Filing Number
CRLMP/3430/2026
Filing Date
02-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRLMP/254/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Judge
Miss Justice Savitri Ratho
Coram
Miss Justice Savitri Ratho
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
FAMILY LAW MATTER ( 13 )
Sub-Category
ADOPTION & MAINTENANCE MATTERS ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUSIL KUMAR BISWAL
Adv. SARADA PRASAD DASH,S.K.DASH, K.GAYA,S.K.DASH, K.GAYA, S.K.DASH, K.GAYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.PUSPITA ROUT
-
2.SRUTI BISWAL
Case History
-
29-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission 1
Miss Justice Savitri Ratho
-
15-Apr-2026
Miss Justice Savitri RathoView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Orissa adjourned the case (CRLMP No. 254 of 2026) to 29.04.2026 for amicable settlement between petitioner Susil Kumar Biswal and opposite parties in a family matter involving an 11-year-old daughter. The petitioner was permitted to file an amended petition correcting typographical errors regarding interim maintenance amount (Rs. 3,000 vs Rs. 4,000) and missing annexures, with the matter to be heard in chambers after lunch. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission 1
Miss Justice Savitri Ratho
-
31-Mar-2026
Miss Justice Savitri RathoView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission 1
Miss Justice Savitri Ratho
-
19-Mar-2026
Miss Justice Savitri RathoView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission 1
Miss Justice Savitri Ratho
-
16-Mar-2026
Miss Justice Savitri RathoView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission
Miss Justice Savitri Ratho
-
05-Mar-2026
Miss Justice Savitri RathoView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLMP/254/2026
Summary: The High Court of Orissa adjourned the case (CRLMP No. 254 of 2026) to 29.04.2026 for amicable settlement between petitioner Susil Kumar Biswal and opposite parties in a family matter involving an 11-year-old daughter. The petitioner was permitted to file an amended petition correcting typographical errors regarding interim maintenance amount (Rs. 3,000 vs Rs. 4,000) and missing annexures, with the matter to be heard in chambers after lunch. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts