BILASH CHANDRA RAJ SUJIT KUMAR DAS, A.K.DAS, R.B.DAS, P.NAIK vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL /1250/2026
Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 439. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010048992026
e-Filing Number
20-01-2026
Filing Number
BLAPL /2173/2026
Filing Date
20-01-2026
Registration No
BLAPL /1250/2026
Registration Date
04-02-2026
Judge
MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY
Coram
MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BILASH CHANDRA RAJ SUJIT KUMAR DAS, A.K.DAS, R.B.DAS, P.NAIK
Respondent(s)
STATE OF ODISHA
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY
FOR ORDERS - FRESH BAIL APPLICATIONS U/S 439 Cr.P.C.
TOP OF THE LIST
FOR ORDERS - ADJOURNED BAIL APPLICATIONS U/S 439 Cr.P.C.
FOR ORDERS - FRESH BAIL APPLICATIONS U/S 439 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | FOR ORDERS - FRESH BAIL APPLICATIONS U/S 439 Cr.P.C. | |
| 25-03-2026 | TOP OF THE LIST | |
| 24-03-2026 | FOR ORDERS - ADJOURNED BAIL APPLICATIONS U/S 439 Cr.P.C. | |
| 23-03-2026 | FOR ORDERS - FRESH BAIL APPLICATIONS U/S 439 Cr.P.C. |
Orders
The High Court of Orissa rejected both the interim bail application and the main bail application of petitioner Bilash Chandra Raj in a cyber fraud case involving online investment scams. The court found that while his daughter's medical condition (VSD) did not require his presence at home, the serious nature of allegations against him—including involvement in 98 similar cases, cheating Rs.30 lakhs, and receiving Rs.12.38 crores in fraudulent transactions—warranted continued detention due to flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Orissa rejected both the interim bail application and the main bail application of petitioner Bilash Chandra Raj in a cyber fraud case involving online investment scams. The court found that while his daughter's medical condition (VSD) did not require his presence at home, the serious nature of allegations against him—including involvement in 98 similar cases, cheating Rs.30 lakhs, and receiving Rs.12.38 crores in fraudulent transactions—warranted continued detention due to flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts