R.Natarajan M/s.Ajmal Associates, ,MOHAMMED AQIL A,MUKILAN A,A. SHAPNA,M. MOHAMED ZAMIL,H. MOHAMMED IMRAN vs The Director of Town and Country Planning — WP(MD)/15214/2026

Case under Others Section others. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

CNR: HCMD010707802026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/43315/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/15214/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Local Authorities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R.Natarajan M/s.Ajmal Associates, ,MOHAMMED AQIL A,MUKILAN A,A. SHAPNA,M. MOHAMED ZAMIL,H. MOHAMMED IMRAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Director of Town and Country Planning

  2. 2.The District Revenue Officer,

  3. 3.The Deputy Director of Town and Country Planning,

  4. 4.The Tahsildar,

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant ChandangoudarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(MD) No.15214 of 2026 The petitioner sought approval for a residential layout on land in Survey No.183/3, which was denied because authorities classified part of it as a water body despite revenue records describing it as patta land. The court adjourned the matter, directing the Registry to place it before the Administrative Judge for transfer to the Division Bench specializing in water body disputes, with relisting preferably on 11.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/15214/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD) No.15214 of 2026 The petitioner sought approval for a residential layout on land in Survey No.183/3, which was denied because authorities classified part of it as a water body despite revenue records describing it as patta land. The court adjourned the matter, directing the Registry to place it before the Administrative Judge for transfer to the Division Bench specializing in water body disputes, with relisting preferably on 11.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case