P.S.Chandra Raja vs Priya — SA(MD)/297/2026

Case under U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 100. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCMD010311022026

Filing Number

SA(MD)/18745/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

SA(MD)/297/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Suits ( 149 )

Sub-Category

Declaration ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S.Chandra Raja

    Adv. M.P.SENTHIL,A.MOHAMEDHANEEF-MS/866/2011,A.MOHAMEDHANEEF-MS/866/2011, ,R.NARMATHAN,A.MOHAMEDHANEEF

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Priya

  2. 2.Arulpackiaraja

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. BalajiView PDF

    Case Summary: SA(MD) 297/2026 Outcome: Second appeal admitted on two substantial questions of law. Notice issued to respondents returnable in six weeks; records called from lower courts; matter posted for hearing after six weeks. Key Issues: Whether lower courts correctly determined property title and possession based solely on boundary recitals while ignoring appellant's registered title deeds establishing chain of title, and whether the First Appellate Court improperly dismissed an application to produce additional evidence without considering its relevance and evidentiary value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA(MD)/297/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA(MD) 297/2026 Outcome: Second appeal admitted on two substantial questions of law. Notice issued to respondents returnable in six weeks; records called from lower courts; matter posted for hearing after six weeks. Key Issues: Whether lower courts correctly determined property title and possession based solely on boundary recitals while ignoring appellant's registered title deeds establishing chain of title, and whether the First Appellate Court improperly dismissed an application to produce additional evidence without considering its relevance and evidentiary value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case