Mrs. P. Usha Rani AND 3 OTHERS M/S.ANISH GOPI, L.SARATH PANDIAN(2485/ vs Mr. P.S Saravanan — OA/431/2026

Case under Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCMA013116082025

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

OA/209531/2025

Filing Date

16-12-2025

Registration No

OA/431/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K.KUMARESH BABU

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K.KUMARESH BABU

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Suits ( 149 )

Sub-Category

Partition ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ORIGINALSECTION

Acts & Sections

Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Mrs. P. Usha Rani AND 3 OTHERS M/S.ANISH GOPI, L.SARATH PANDIAN(2485/

,C.DIVAKAR(1297/

,MOB-

Mr.P.P.Jai Ganesh

Mrs.G.Shanthalakshmi

Mr.P.S.Panchatcharam

Respondent(s)

Mr. P.S Saravanan

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.KUMARESH BABU

04-06-2026

MOTION CASES

Orders

04-06-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice K.KUMARESH BABU

Case Summary: OA No. 431/2026 The Madras High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of Mrs. P. Usha Rani and three others against Mr. P.S. Saravanan on 04-06-2026. The applicants sought protection over jointly-owned property, alleging the respondent was attempting unauthorized dealings that would harm their co-ownership rights. The court found a prima facie case for injunction and ordered the respondent be restrained from dealing with the property. The case is listed for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OA No. 431/2026 The Madras High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of Mrs. P. Usha Rani and three others against Mr. P.S. Saravanan on 04-06-2026. The applicants sought protection over jointly-owned property, alleging the respondent was attempting unauthorized dealings that would harm their co-ownership rights. The court found a prima facie case for injunction and ordered the respondent be restrained from dealing with the property. The case is listed for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case