B. VENKATAREDDY vs N.M.VENKATARAMA REDDY — SA/363/2026

Case under U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCMA011394652025

Filing Number

SA/98308/2025

Filing Date

27-Jun-2025

Registration No

SA/363/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Suits ( 149 )

Sub-Category

Declaration ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.B. VENKATAREDDY

    Adv. D.Shivakumaran, ,S.Mayilnathan,G.Satheesh-MS/1659/2018,S.P.NIRMALA PARAMESWARI

  2. 2.N.Sathyanarayanareddy

  3. 3.Ravindranath Reddy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.N.M.VENKATARAMA REDDY

  2. 2.N.R.Sudhakar

  3. 3.N.R.Kodandaramareddy

  4. 4.N.M.Venu

  5. 5.N.M.Gopal Reddy

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice S. SountharView PDF

    Case Summary: SA/363/2026 The Second Appeal challenging a suit dismissal was admitted. The court identified two substantial questions of law: (1) whether lower courts correctly rejected old partition deeds (40-50+ years) as evidence of title, and (2) whether they were correct in treating the defendants' UDR patta as conclusive title and dismissing the appellants' declaration suit. Notice issued to respondents with six-week returnable date; matter listed for hearing after six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

  4. 27-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/363/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA/363/2026 The Second Appeal challenging a suit dismissal was admitted. The court identified two substantial questions of law: (1) whether lower courts correctly rejected old partition deeds (40-50+ years) as evidence of title, and (2) whether they were correct in treating the defendants' UDR patta as conclusive title and dismissing the appellants' declaration suit. Notice issued to respondents with six-week returnable date; matter listed for hearing after six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case