Archana Ruia vs Choodamani Narayanan — WA/1519/2026

Case under U/c 15 of Letters Patent Set Section 1. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jul-2026

CNR: HCMA011192232026

Filing Number

WA/87051/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

WA/1519/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Local Authorities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/c 15 of Letters Patent Set Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Archana Ruia

    Adv. K.P.Sanjeev Kumar,Vignesh,Vignesh, Sahil Nathani,Yazhini,A. Sarangan,Vignesh

  2. 2.Ruia Developers LLP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Choodamani Narayanan

  2. 2.Sadayavel Kailasam

  3. 3.Sriram Sivaraman

  4. 4.Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA)

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jul-2026

    For Admission - (Wa)

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

    Case Summary: WA/1519/2026 The Madras High Court issued notice to respondents 1-3 returnable on 15.07.2026 in the writ appeal filed by Archana Ruia and Ruia Developers LLP against Choodamani Narayanan and others. The court ordered that any construction undertaken by the appellants shall be at their sole risk and cost, subject to the final outcome of this appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/1519/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WA/1519/2026 The Madras High Court issued notice to respondents 1-3 returnable on 15.07.2026 in the writ appeal filed by Archana Ruia and Ruia Developers LLP against Choodamani Narayanan and others. The court ordered that any construction undertaken by the appellants shall be at their sole risk and cost, subject to the final outcome of this appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case