Metropolitan Transport Corporation S. Gokul, R.T.RESHMA,S.KARUPASAMY,M.GOKUL PRASANTH vs D. Arumugam — WMP/23159/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--ORDERED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011178552026

Filing Number

WMP/86126/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

WMP/23159/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Ultra Vires Rule and Regulation Act ( 206 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ORDERED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Metropolitan Transport Corporation S. Gokul, R.T.RESHMA,S.KARUPASAMY,M.GOKUL PRASANTH

  2. 2.T.SARAVANAKUMAR

  3. 3.K.SRINIVASAN TREASURER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.D. Arumugam

  2. 2.UNION OF INDIA

  3. 3.GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

    Case Summary: WMP No. 23159/2026 The Madras High Court granted leave to the Metropolitan Transport Corporation union members to file a review application against an April 27, 2026 writ petition order. The court found that the respondent filed the writ petition challenging Section 22 of the Industrial Relations Code without disclosing pending related proceedings or making the applicants parties, despite fairness requiring their inclusion given their substantive interest in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Miscellaneous Petitions (Wp)

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WMP/23159/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WMP No. 23159/2026 The Madras High Court granted leave to the Metropolitan Transport Corporation union members to file a review application against an April 27, 2026 writ petition order. The court found that the respondent filed the writ petition challenging Section 22 of the Industrial Relations Code without disclosing pending related proceedings or making the applicants parties, despite fairness requiring their inclusion given their substantive interest in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case