Metropolitan Transport Corporation S. Gokul, R.T.RESHMA,S.KARUPASAMY,M.GOKUL PRASANTH vs D. Arumugam — WMP/23159/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--ORDERED on 12th June 2026.

CNR: HCMA011178552026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WMP/86126/2026

Filing Date

01-06-2026

Registration No

WMP/23159/2026

Registration Date

04-06-2026

Judge

Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE , Honourable Mr.Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN

Coram

Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE , Honourable Mr.Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Ultra Vires Rule and Regulation Act ( 206 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

12th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ORDERED

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Metropolitan Transport Corporation S. Gokul, R.T.RESHMA,S.KARUPASAMY,M.GOKUL PRASANTH

T.SARAVANAKUMAR

K.SRINIVASAN TREASURER

Respondent(s)

D. Arumugam

UNION OF INDIA

GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE , Honourable Mr.Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN

12-06-2026

MISCELLANEOUS PETITIONS (WP)

Orders

12-06-2026
Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN

Case Summary: WMP No. 23159/2026 The Madras High Court granted leave to the Metropolitan Transport Corporation union members to file a review application against an April 27, 2026 writ petition order. The court found that the respondent filed the writ petition challenging Section 22 of the Industrial Relations Code without disclosing pending related proceedings or making the applicants parties, despite fairness requiring their inclusion given their substantive interest in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WMP No. 23159/2026 The Madras High Court granted leave to the Metropolitan Transport Corporation union members to file a review application against an April 27, 2026 writ petition order. The court found that the respondent filed the writ petition challenging Section 22 of the Industrial Relations Code without disclosing pending related proceedings or making the applicants parties, despite fairness requiring their inclusion given their substantive interest in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Others All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case