M.BALAJI M/S.M.A.M.RAJA, A.Jenifer Parvin Raja vs The Government of India — WP/17884/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010987292026
Filing Number
WP/73184/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/17884/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala
Coram
Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Land Acquisition ( 96 )
Sub-Category
Land Encroachment ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M.BALAJI M/S.M.A.M.RAJA, A.Jenifer Parvin Raja
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Government of India
-
2.The Director Defence Rsearch and Development
-
3.The Estate manager
-
4.The Area Manager
-
5.The Canteen store Department (CSD)
-
6.The Commissioner of Land Revenue
-
7.The District collector
-
8.The District Revenue officer
-
9.The Tahsildar
-
10.The Village Administrative officer
Case History
-
01-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Case Summary: WP 17884/2026 M. Balaji sought to quash an encroachment removal notice and direct respondents to vacate disputed land in Pallavaram village based on a patta (land deed). The Government of India and DRDO contested the claim, alleging the patta is fabricated. The Madras High Court adjourned the petition, directing the Government Advocate (respondents 6-10) to conduct a prima facie inquiry into the patta's authenticity and file a counter-affidavit, with the matter to be posted after six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
Admission (Wp)
Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/17884/2026
Case Summary: WP 17884/2026 M. Balaji sought to quash an encroachment removal notice and direct respondents to vacate disputed land in Pallavaram village based on a patta (land deed). The Government of India and DRDO contested the claim, alleging the patta is fabricated. The Madras High Court adjourned the petition, directing the Government Advocate (respondents 6-10) to conduct a prima facie inquiry into the patta's authenticity and file a counter-affidavit, with the matter to be posted after six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts