Integrated Finance Company Limited vs Ashok Nambiar — CRP/3079/2026
Case under U/a 227 Constitution of India Section 1. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010683922026
Filing Number
CRP/50299/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRP/3079/2026
Registration Date
21-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mrs.Justice T.v.thamilselvi
Coram
Honourable Mrs.Justice T.v.thamilselvi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Civil Revision Petition ( 166 )
Sub-Category
Article 227 of the Constitution of India ( 44 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Integrated Finance Company Limited
Adv. V.P.Raman,k.seshasayee,k.seshasayee, R.B.Rishabh,k.seshasayee
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ashok Nambiar
-
2.J.P.Diaz,
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mrs.Justice T.v.thamilselvi
-
02-Jun-2026
Honourable Mrs.Justice T.v.thamilselviView PDF
Case Summary: CRP 3079/2026 The Madras High Court (Justice T.V. Thamilselvi) issued a preliminary order on an execution petition closure. Integrated Finance Company Limited challenged the trial court's December 11, 2025 order closing Execution Petition 2592/2019 based on an unsupported memo claiming the decree-holder lost memory. The High Court noted the trial court improperly relied on this memo without medical evidence and failed to consider that a prior administrative order cannot nullify the judicial appointment of the company's authorized signatory. The court issued notice to respondents Ashok Nambiar and J.P. Diaz returnable by June 23, 2026, for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRP/3079/2026
Case Summary: CRP 3079/2026 The Madras High Court (Justice T.V. Thamilselvi) issued a preliminary order on an execution petition closure. Integrated Finance Company Limited challenged the trial court's December 11, 2025 order closing Execution Petition 2592/2019 based on an unsupported memo claiming the decree-holder lost memory. The High Court noted the trial court improperly relied on this memo without medical evidence and failed to consider that a prior administrative order cannot nullify the judicial appointment of the company's authorized signatory. The court issued notice to respondents Ashok Nambiar and J.P. Diaz returnable by June 23, 2026, for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts