Integrated Finance Company Limited vs Ashok Nambiar — CRP/3079/2026

Case under U/a 227 Constitution of India Section 1. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

CNR: HCMA010683922026

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

Filing Number

CRP/50299/2026

Filing Date

18-03-2026

Registration No

CRP/3079/2026

Registration Date

21-05-2026

Judge

Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI

Coram

Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Civil Revision Petition ( 166 )

Sub-Category

Article 227 of the Constitution of India ( 44 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Acts & Sections

U/a 227 Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Integrated Finance Company Limited

Adv. V.P.Raman,k.seshasayee,k.seshasayee, R.B.Rishabh,k.seshasayee

Respondent(s)

Ashok Nambiar

J.P.Diaz,

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI

02-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION

23-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

02-06-2026
Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI

Case Summary: CRP 3079/2026 The Madras High Court (Justice T.V. Thamilselvi) issued a preliminary order on an execution petition closure. Integrated Finance Company Limited challenged the trial court's December 11, 2025 order closing Execution Petition 2592/2019 based on an unsupported memo claiming the decree-holder lost memory. The High Court noted the trial court improperly relied on this memo without medical evidence and failed to consider that a prior administrative order cannot nullify the judicial appointment of the company's authorized signatory. The court issued notice to respondents Ashok Nambiar and J.P. Diaz returnable by June 23, 2026, for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRP 3079/2026 The Madras High Court (Justice T.V. Thamilselvi) issued a preliminary order on an execution petition closure. Integrated Finance Company Limited challenged the trial court's December 11, 2025 order closing Execution Petition 2592/2019 based on an unsupported memo claiming the decree-holder lost memory. The High Court noted the trial court improperly relied on this memo without medical evidence and failed to consider that a prior administrative order cannot nullify the judicial appointment of the company's authorized signatory. The court issued notice to respondents Ashok Nambiar and J.P. Diaz returnable by June 23, 2026, for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case