M/S TEJA INDUSTRIES M/S.MONICA CHOPDA, MOB-9176372339,KARTIC RAJA(6469/ vs MOHAMMED SHAFFI A R — OA/532/2026
Case under Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section 1. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCMA010217162026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
OA/15949/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
OA/532/2026
Registration Date
02-06-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice K.KUMARESH BABU
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice K.KUMARESH BABU
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMMERCIAL SUITS ( 179 )
Sub-Category
Trade Marks ( 25 )
Judicial Branch
ORIGINALSECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S TEJA INDUSTRIES M/S.MONICA CHOPDA, MOB-9176372339,KARTIC RAJA(6469/
,SRIPRADA PRABAKARAN.C,S.MANOJ(9337/
Respondent(s)
MOHAMMED SHAFFI A R
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.KUMARESH BABU
MOTION CASES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | MOTION CASES |
Orders
Case Summary: OA Nos. 532 and 533 of 2026 M/s Teja Industries obtained interim injunctions against Mohammed Shaffi A R restraining him from passing off or infringing the "HIDE CRAFT" trademark (registration nos. 2418320, 2418321, 2418322, 2418323) through identical or deceptively similar business names or logos. The court found balance of convenience favored the applicant, noting the respondent's application was abandoned and the applicant had used the mark for nearly a decade. Notice issued to respondent returnable in six weeks; case adjourned for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OA Nos. 532 and 533 of 2026 M/s Teja Industries obtained interim injunctions against Mohammed Shaffi A R restraining him from passing off or infringing the "HIDE CRAFT" trademark (registration nos. 2418320, 2418321, 2418322, 2418323) through identical or deceptively similar business names or logos. The court found balance of convenience favored the applicant, noting the respondent's application was abandoned and the applicant had used the mark for nearly a decade. Notice issued to respondent returnable in six weeks; case adjourned for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts