A.ALLIMUTHU M/S. V.SRIMATHI vs R.GUNASEKARAN — SA/795/2010

Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HCMA010133122010

Filing Number

SA/61057/2010

Filing Date

14-Jul-2010

Registration No

SA/795/2010

Registration Date

19-Jul-2010

Judge

Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala

Coram

Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SECOND APPEAL ( 169 )

Sub-Category

S. 100 CPC ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A.ALLIMUTHU M/S. V.SRIMATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R.GUNASEKARAN

    Adv. R.RAJARAJAN,S.PRABHU,R.DILLIKUMAR FOR SOLE RESPONDENT 1123

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Sa Cases

    Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MalaView PDF

    The Second Appeal was admitted by the High Court on three substantial questions of law concerning whether the lower appellate court erred in dismissing the suit despite the plaintiff's failure to prove continued readiness and willingness under Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act, whether burden of proof was discharged without documentary or oral evidence, and whether strict compliance with contract terms was required. The case was adjourned for further hearing on 15.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Sa Cases

    Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Notice Of Motion

    Honourable Mr.Justice Sunder Mohan

  6. 11-Apr-2022

    Sa Cases

    Honourable Mrs Justice R. Hemalatha

  7. 22-Mar-2022

    Sa Cases

    Honourable Mrs Justice R. Hemalatha

  8. 21-Mar-2022

    Sa Cases

    Honourable Mrs Justice R. Hemalatha

  9. 03-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 14-Jul-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/795/2010

casestatus.in Summary

The Second Appeal was admitted by the High Court on three substantial questions of law concerning whether the lower appellate court erred in dismissing the suit despite the plaintiff's failure to prove continued readiness and willingness under Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act, whether burden of proof was discharged without documentary or oral evidence, and whether strict compliance with contract terms was required. The case was adjourned for further hearing on 15.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case