ARJUN M N vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — CRL.P/17271/2025

Case under None Section NONE. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010834122025

Filing Number

CRL.P/16897/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRL.P/17271/2025

Registration Date

19-Dec-2025

Judge

M.nagaprasanna

Coram

M.nagaprasanna

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRL.P ( 112 )

Sub-Category

438(Cr.PC) / 482(BNSS)-U/S 438/-U/S 482 ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

None Section NONE

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARJUN M N

    Adv. POORNIMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    M.nagaprasannaView PDF

    The Karnataka High Court dismissed Arjun M.N.'s anticipatory bail petition, holding that mere apprehension of arrest is insufficient without a registered complaint. The court noted that as of April 16, 2026, no complaint had been registered against the petitioner by Ruban Bridge Pvt. Ltd., thereby negating the basis for anticipatory bail. The petition was disposed with liberty reserved for the petitioner to approach appropriate forums if a rational apprehension of arrest materializes in future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jan-2026

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time

    Registrar (Review And Statistics)

  4. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRL.P/17271/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Karnataka High Court dismissed Arjun M.N.'s anticipatory bail petition, holding that mere apprehension of arrest is insufficient without a registered complaint. The court noted that as of April 16, 2026, no complaint had been registered against the petitioner by Ruban Bridge Pvt. Ltd., thereby negating the basis for anticipatory bail. The petition was disposed with liberty reserved for the petitioner to approach appropriate forums if a rational apprehension of arrest materializes in future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case