SMT PRAMODA DEVI WADIYAR vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — WP/32774/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: KAHC010704042025

Filing Number

WP/32620/2025

Filing Date

27-Oct-2025

Registration No

WP/32774/2025

Registration Date

30-Oct-2025

Judge

E.s.indiresh

Coram

E.s.indiresh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 144 )

Sub-Category

RR/SUR-Record of rights,Survey & Boundary disp. ( 96 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT PRAMODA DEVI WADIYAR

    Adv. AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

  2. 2.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

  4. 4.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

  5. 5.THE TAHSILDAR

  6. 6.THE MYSURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

    Adv. T.P VIVEKANANDA

  7. 7.THE KARNATAKA EXHIBITION AUTHORITY

  8. 8.THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTIES

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    E.s.indireshView PDF

    The High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by SMT PRAMODA DEVI WADIYAR challenging an entry in the RTC (Record of Rights) regarding 145.13 acres in Mysuru, directing her to exhaust administrative remedies under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act within one month. The court reserved liberty for the petitioner to approach the competent authority while keeping all contentions open and restraining respondents from precipitating action for one month, with time spent before the court condoned under the Limitation Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Nov-2025

    Non-Compliance Of Office-Objns For 1St Time

    S Sunil Dutt Yadav

  4. 27-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/32774/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by SMT PRAMODA DEVI WADIYAR challenging an entry in the RTC (Record of Rights) regarding 145.13 acres in Mysuru, directing her to exhaust administrative remedies under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act within one month. The court reserved liberty for the petitioner to approach the competent authority while keeping all contentions open and restraining respondents from precipitating action for one month, with time spent before the court condoned under the Limitation Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case