RAVI KUMAR P H vs KRISHNA KUMAR M — CRL.RP/796/2024
Case under None Section none. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th June 2026.
CNR: KAHC010333942024
Filing Number
CRL.RP/782/2024
Filing Date
13-06-2024
Registration No
CRL.RP/796/2024
Registration Date
18-06-2024
Judge
H.P.SANDESH
Coram
H.P.SANDESH
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRL.RP ( 114 )
Sub-Category
397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)-U/S 397/-U/S 438 ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
08th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAVI KUMAR P H
Adv. SHARAN B T
Respondent(s)
KRISHNA KUMAR M
Adv. ,SHRINIVAS MANOHAR KULKARNI 1123
Hearing History
Judge: H.P.SANDESH
NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME
ADMISSION
ORDERS
REPORTING SETTLEMENT
REPORTING SETTLEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-06-2024 | NON-COMPLIANCE OF OFFICE-OBJNS FOR 1ST TIME |
| 29-04-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 22-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 03-12-2024 | REPORTING SETTLEMENT |
| 07-11-2024 | REPORTING SETTLEMENT |
Orders
Summary of CRL.RP 796/2024 The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Ravi Kumar P H's criminal revision petition after he repeatedly failed to comply with court orders spanning nearly two years. Despite being given multiple opportunities and a suspended sentence conditional on depositing 50% of the fine amount, the petitioner neither complied with the deposit requirement nor the settlement reporting deadline. After issuing non-bailable warrants that were eventually executed, the court found the petitioner lacked respect for court orders and dismissed the revision petition, directing his production before the trial court for issuance of a conviction warrant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CRL.RP 796/2024 The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Ravi Kumar P H's criminal revision petition after he repeatedly failed to comply with court orders spanning nearly two years. Despite being given multiple opportunities and a suspended sentence conditional on depositing 50% of the fine amount, the petitioner neither complied with the deposit requirement nor the settlement reporting deadline. After issuing non-bailable warrants that were eventually executed, the court found the petitioner lacked respect for court orders and dismissed the revision petition, directing his production before the trial court for issuance of a conviction warrant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts